Frequently Asked Questions
Expert answers to common questions about file testing, format selection, and development workflows.
Quick Navigation
General Testing Questions
Recommended testing strategy:
- Small files (50KB-200KB): Test basic functionality and edge cases
- Medium files (500KB-2MB): Validate typical user scenarios
- Large files (5MB+): Stress-test memory usage and performance
Always test with the actual file sizes your users will encounter. Our samples provide this range across all formats to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Cross-platform testing approach:
- Browser Testing: Test in Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge with our web-optimized formats
- Mobile Testing: Validate on iOS and Android with different screen densities
- Desktop Applications: Test native applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux
- Server-side Processing: Verify backend file handling with various libraries
Use our samples to create automated test suites that run across all target platforms.
Comprehensive upload testing strategy:
- Size Limits: Test files just under, at, and over your size limits
- Format Validation: Try uploading files with correct extensions but wrong content
- Malformed Files: Test with corrupted or incomplete files
- Network Conditions: Simulate slow connections and interruptions
- Concurrent Uploads: Test multiple simultaneous uploads
Our samples include various sizes and can be modified to test edge cases safely.
Format Selection Questions
Modern web audio recommendations:
- AAC: Best overall choice - better quality than MP3 at same bitrates, wide browser support
- MP3: Universal fallback - works everywhere but less efficient than AAC
- Opus: Future-forward choice - excellent quality and compression, growing support
- OGG Vorbis: Open-source alternative - good for Firefox and Chrome
Pro tip: Use AAC as primary with MP3 fallback. Test with our samples to validate your implementation.
Compression types explained:
Lossy Compression
- How it works: Removes data deemed less important
- Pros: Much smaller file sizes
- Cons: Quality loss, irreversible
- Examples: MP3, JPEG, MP4 (H.264)
- Best for: Web delivery, streaming
Lossless Compression
- How it works: Reduces size without losing data
- Pros: Perfect quality preservation
- Cons: Larger file sizes
- Examples: FLAC, PNG, ZIP
- Best for: Archival, editing
Test both types with our samples to understand the quality vs. size trade-offs for your use case.
Modern web image strategy:
Format | Use Case | Browser Support | Size Savings |
---|---|---|---|
WebP | Photos, graphics | 96%+ modern browsers | 25-35% vs JPEG |
AVIF | Next-gen photos | 85%+ modern browsers | 50%+ vs JPEG |
JPEG | Fallback photos | Universal | Baseline |
PNG | Transparency, graphics | Universal | Lossless |
SVG | Icons, simple graphics | Universal | Scalable |
Implementation: Use WebP/AVIF with JPEG fallback via <picture>
element.
Development Questions
Multi-layer validation approach:
- Client-side: Check file extension and MIME type for UX
- Server-side: Always validate - never trust client data
- Magic bytes: Check file headers/signatures
- Content parsing: Attempt to parse file with appropriate library
Example validation layers:
// 1. Extension check
if (!filename.endsWith('.jpg')) return false;
// 2. MIME type check
if (file.type !== 'image/jpeg') return false;
// 3. Magic bytes check (server-side)
if (!startsWithJPEGHeader(fileBytes)) return false;
// 4. Parse attempt
try { parseImage(fileBytes); } catch { return false; }
Use our samples to test each validation layer and ensure robust security.
Large file upload strategies:
- Chunked uploads: Split files into smaller pieces (1-5MB chunks)
- Resumable uploads: Allow continuing interrupted uploads
- Progress tracking: Provide real-time upload feedback
- Background processing: Process files asynchronously
- Direct cloud uploads: Use signed URLs for direct S3/Azure uploads
Pro Tip
Test with our large sample files (5MB+) to validate your chunking implementation and timeout handling.
Modern font loading optimization:
- Format selection: Use WOFF2 (best compression) with WOFF fallback
- Preload critical fonts:
<link rel="preload" href="font.woff2" as="font">
- Font-display strategy: Use
font-display: swap
for body text - Subset fonts: Include only needed characters/languages
- Self-host fonts: Avoid third-party font service delays
Optimal CSS implementation:
@font-face {
font-family: 'MyFont';
src: url('myfont.woff2') format('woff2'),
url('myfont.woff') format('woff');
font-display: swap;
unicode-range: U+0020-007E; /* Basic Latin */
}
Test font loading performance with our font samples across different connection speeds.
Performance Questions
Comprehensive performance testing approach:
- Baseline measurement: Test with various file sizes (50KB to 5MB+)
- Memory profiling: Monitor RAM usage during processing
- CPU utilization: Track processing load and bottlenecks
- I/O performance: Measure read/write speeds
- Concurrent processing: Test multiple simultaneous operations
Key Metrics to Track:
- Processing time per MB
- Memory peak usage
- Throughput (files/second)
- Error rates under load
Testing Tools:
- Load testing frameworks
- Memory profilers
- Performance monitoring
- Automated benchmarks
Use our graduated file sizes to create consistent performance baselines.
Compression algorithm performance characteristics:
Algorithm | Compression Speed | Decompression Speed | Ratio | Best Use Case |
---|---|---|---|---|
LZ4 | Very Fast | Very Fast | Low | Real-time processing |
ZSTD | Fast | Fast | Good | Balanced performance |
GZIP | Medium | Fast | Good | Web compression |
LZMA2 | Slow | Medium | Excellent | Archival storage |
Performance tip: Choose algorithms based on your CPU vs. bandwidth constraints. Test with our archive samples to find the optimal balance.
Adaptive bitrate streaming optimization:
- Multiple quality levels: Create 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p variants
- Appropriate bitrates:
- 240p: 400-700 kbps
- 480p: 750-1200 kbps
- 720p: 1500-3000 kbps
- 1080p: 3000-6000 kbps
- Smart switching logic: Monitor bandwidth and buffer health
- Preloading strategy: Buffer ahead based on connection stability
- Fallback options: Always provide lower quality alternatives
Testing Strategy
Use our video samples to test streaming performance across simulated network conditions (3G, 4G, WiFi, throttled connections).
Additional Questions
Regular testing maintenance schedule:
- Monthly: Check for new format specifications and browser updates
- Quarterly: Update test files with new format versions and edge cases
- After major releases: Re-validate all file handling when updating dependencies
- When issues arise: Add specific test cases to prevent regression
Stay current with format evolution - new codecs, compression improvements, and security updates require ongoing validation.
Essential file upload security measures:
- Never trust file extensions: Always validate file content
- Scan for malware: Use antivirus scanning for user uploads
- Isolate processing: Process files in sandboxed environments
- Limit file sizes: Prevent DoS attacks with reasonable limits
- Validate metadata: Check for embedded scripts or malicious data
- Store safely: Keep uploads outside web root directory
Security Warning
Never execute or directly serve user-uploaded files. Always process and validate them first. Our samples are safe for testing, but treat all user uploads as potentially malicious.
Still Have Questions?
Can't find the answer you're looking for? Our technical team is here to help with your file testing and development challenges.
Contact Our Experts